me

dd | 29
lazy gifmaker
occasional writer

tracking #jaskierbatey

the blog
multifandom smorgasboard

mostly the witcher, merlin, movies, and dean winchester

mostly queueing everything, occasionally posting original content

currently
on semi hiatus

watching: brooklyn 99, mythic quest, the magicians s5
reading: geraskier fic, sterek fic
giffing:the hardy boys, ginger snaps trilogy, STUFF
writing: see projects
playing: the witcher

other
queen of forgetting about gif/edit series and accidentally abandoning them

goat-yells-at-everything:

iconuk01:

ravenfirethief:

banahbanah:

iconuk01:

kintatsujo:

froody:

techskylander:

froody:

froody:

Victor refusing to make the Monster a wife because he was worried they’d breed is such a cop out. Like, you’re cobbling together body parts from charnel houses. You can just not give her any ovaries. You can just spay her like a cat. Why are you this dumb Victor. You’re a doctor.

the implication that victor spend weeks giving the monster a working dick is also extremely weird

Something to remember is that Victor didn’t just give the monster a working dick! He wanted his creation to be made of the best parts of men-it’s why the monster is made up of so many different pieces rather than one fresh corpse, why he’s so large, and why Victor is disappointed that he isn’t beautiful.

So, what does this mean? It means that Victor looked at the dicks of various corpses, testing not only to make sure they work, but also to find what he considered to be the best corpse dick. Does this mean the monster was extremely hung? Or did Victor simply pick the dick that seemed most attractive to him? Did he memorize the appearance of the dicks, or did he line them up to compare?

We’ll never know, because the original story never touches on the subject, and it’s one of the few flaws in Mary Shelley’s work.

I know I started this conversation but I’m so sorry I did

Considering we know who Mary Shelley was spending time around I guarantee this was a CONVERSATION that she actively and adamantly refused to actually include in the text

Well, there is ONE adaptation which includes this very discussion.

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SClmiso_2Y 

I feel it’s my duty to make sure everyone sees this because the still images don’t do the comedic timing of that pause justice.

Gene Wilder was a comedic master.

A rare example of a movie with absolutely NO poor performances, and every single member of the cast firing on all cylinders.

Thats just how Mel rolls. All his movies are great.

2 months ago &. 175,823 notes Reblog

vintagegal:

Young Frankenstein (1974) dir. Mel Brooks

5 years ago &. 17,081 notes Reblog

cybillshepherd:

For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius.
7 years ago &. 1,692 notes Reblog